Dermatologists' Perceptions and Use of Electronic Health Record Systems
Main Article Content
Keywords
dermatologist, dermatology, electronic medical records, EMR, provider efficiency
Abstract
Introduction: Electronic Health Records (EHR) have been adopted and integrated into medical practices over the past 20 years. Many positive and negative implications have been described by physicians using EHR. This study aims to US dermatologists' perceptions and use of EHR within their clinical practice.
Methods: A validated survey was administered to US dermatologists at a national educational conference to assess use and perceptions of EHR.
Results Seventy-two percent (291/400) of those sampled completed greater than 90% survey and were included in outcome analysis. Eighty-six percent of the participants were currently using or had used EHR. Most dermatologists felt that EHR negatively impacted their workflow efficiency and face-to-face time with patients. A portion of dermatologists thought that EHR improved their documentation.
Limitations: Selection bias may have led those with strong beliefs with EHR more likely to complete the entire survey.
Conclusion: Despite widespread adoption, most dermatologists have a negative impression of EHR and felt that it interfered with their ability to effectively see patients. Interventions to improve EHR should focus on improving workflow efficiency and maximizing the amount of time dermatologists can spend with patients.
References
2. Lakbala P, Dindarloo K. Physicians’ perception and attitude toward electronic medical record. Springerplus. 2014; 3: 63. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-63
3. Read-Brown S, Hribar MR, Reznick LG, et al. Time requirements of electronic health record use in an academic ophthalmology center. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135 (11): 1250-1257.
4. Read-Brown S, Hribar MR, Reznick LG, et al. Time requirements of electronic health record use in an academic ophthalmology center. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135 (11): 1250-1257.
5. Jetté N, Kwon C. Electronic Health Records—A System Only as Beneficial as Its Data. JAMA Netw Open. Published online September 18, 20192(9):e1911679. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11679
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY): lets others distribute and copy the article, to create extracts, abstracts, and other revised versions, adaptations or derivative works of or from an article (such as a translation), to include in a collective work (such as an anthology), to text or data mine the article, even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit the author(s), do not represent the author as endorsing their adaptation of the article, and do not modify the article in such a way as to damage the author's honor or reputation.
Authors retain copyright in their work and license the publisher to publish the content. The publisher is the National Society for Cutaneous Medicine, with production and publishing support provided by OJS, Open Journal Systems,see https://pkp.sfu.
Prior to January 2022, authors transferred copyright to the National Society for Cutaneous Medicine. However, all articles are freely available to anyone in the world. There are no subscription fees, page charges, or article processing charges.