Do Second-Time Users of Topical Imiquimod have a More Rapid Onset of Clinical Response?

Main Article Content

Stacy L McMurray
Matthew Reynolds
Matthew S Dinehart
Scott M Dinehart

Keywords

Imiquimod, actinic keratoses, immune recall

Abstract

Introduction: Topical imiquimod is commonly used in dermatology for treatment of actinic keratoses (AK). Prior studies in humans and mice have suggested the potential for immune recall with imiquimod based on higher degrees of AK clearance and activation of memory γδ T-cells in a mouse model. Anecdotal reports suggest a more rapid time-to-onset of clinical response with second time use of imiquimod. However, the potential for immune recall demonstrated by time-to-onset of clinical response has not been formally investigated.

Objective:  The primary objective of this study was to determine if there is a difference in time-to-onset of clinical response between naïve and prior users of topical imiquimod for the treatment of actinic keratoses.

Methods:  A total of 92 patients were treated with 5% imiquimod cream for actinic keratoses of the head and neck. Patients were instructed to apply 5% imiquimod cream to the affected areas once daily until reaching a therapeutic endpoint of crusting/scabbing. The primary endpoints in the study were time (days) to onset of erythema and time to onset of crusting/scabbing. Results were self-reported.

Results:  The average time (days) to onset of erythema was 5.48 ± 3.19 days in naïve users and 4.7 ± 2.91 days in prior users (p= 0.22). Average time to onset of crusting/scabbing was 9.2 ± 4.34 days in naïve users and 9.02 ± 3.65 days in prior users (p=0.35).

Conclusion:  Our study revealed there is no difference in time-to-onset of erythema or scabbing/crusting with second-time use of imiquimod.  While immune recall may be possible with use of imiquimod, the results of this study indicate that it may be independent of time-to-onset of clinical response.  

References

1. Exton, PA: Graceway Pharmaceuticals; 2008. Aldara [package insert]

2. Del Rosso JQ. The treatment of viral infections and nonmelanoma skin cancers. Cutis. 2007;79(4 Suppl):29–35. [PubMed]

3. Yang X, Dinehart M. Triple Hedgehog Pathway Inhibition for Basal Cell Carcinoma. Journal Of Clinical & Aesthetic Dermatology[serial online]. April 2017;10(4):47-49. Available from: CINAHL Complete, Ipswich, MA. Accessed January 22, 2018.

4. Bozrova S, Levitsky V, Nedospasov S, et al. Imiquimod: The biochemical mechanisms of immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory activity. Biochemistry (Moscow) Supplement Series B: Biomedical Chemistry [serial online]. April 1, 2013;7(2):136-145. Available from: Scopus®, Ipswich, MA. Accessed January 23, 2018.

5. Krawtchenko N, Roewert-Huber J, Ulrich M, et al. A randomised study of topical 5% imiquimod vs. topical 5-fluorouracil vs. cryosurgery in immunocompetent patients with actinic keratoses: A comparison of clinical and histological outcomes including 1-year follow-up. British Journal Of Dermatology [serial online]. December 1, 2007;157(SUPPL. 2):34-40. Available from: Scopus®, Ipswich, MA. Accessed January 23, 2018.

6. Hartwig T, Pantelyushin S, Croxford AL, et al. Dermal IL-17-producing gammadelta T cells establish long-lived memory in the skin. Eur J Immunol. 2015;45(11):3022-33.

7. Kirby J, Miller J, Delikat A, Leslie D. Bundled Payment Models for Actinic Keratosis Management. Jama Dermatology [serial online]. n.d.;152(7):789-796. Available from: Science Citation Index, Ipswich, MA. Accessed January 22, 2018.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.