Community Educational Interventions: An Effective Means to Improve Photoprotection and Skin Cancer Awareness in Outdoor Occupational Workers
Main Article Content
Keywords
education, prevention, skin cancer
Abstract
Introduction: Outdoor workers are at increased risk for developing skin cancer compared to the general population due to environmental conditions at work sites and riskier behavior regarding skin cancer risk factors. In many populations, sun protection education is associated with increased use of sun protective measures. This study aimed to assess outdoor workers’ knowledge of sun safety and evaluate the impact of educational measures on the awareness of photoprotection practices.
Methods: A group of medical students visited construction sites in Birmingham, AL, to deliver 15-minute presentations on the risks of prolonged UV exposure and the prevention of photodamage. Identical 10-question surveys were given to each participant before and after the presentation. Participants rated their level of agreement with statements on photoprotection and skin cancer.
Results: The survey response rate was 79%. Analysis revealed an average pre-presentation score of 3.01 and a post-presentation score of 3.73. Two-sample paired t-tests for each question yielded statistically significant results (p <0.05).
Conclusion: Outdoor occupational workers reported a better understanding of the risks of UV exposure and a greater willingness to engage in sun-protective practices following a brief educational intervention. These findings suggest that community-based education may improve awareness regarding photoprotection and skin cancer risk.
References
2. Rocholl, M., Ludewig, M., John, S. M., Bitzer, E. M., & Wilke, A. (2020). Outdoor workers' perceptions of skin cancer risk and attitudes to sun-protective measures: A qualitative study. Journal of occupational health, 62(1), e12083
3. Trakatelli, M., Barkitzi, K., Apap, C., Majewski, S., De Vries, E., & EPIDERM group (2016). Skin cancer risk in outdoor workers: a European multicenter case-control study. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 30 Suppl 3, 5–11.
4. Sena JS, Girão RJ, Carvalho SM, Tavares RM, Fonseca FL, Silva PB, Barbosa MC. Occupational skin cancer: Systematic review. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2016 May-Jun;62(3):280-6. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.62.03.280. PMID: 27310554.
5. Zink A, Schielein M, Wildner M, Rehfuess EA. 'Try to make good hay in the shade – it won't work!' A qualitative interview study on the perspectives of Bavarian farmers regarding primary prevention of skin cancer. Br J Dermatol. 2019;180:1412‐1419.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY): lets others distribute and copy the article, to create extracts, abstracts, and other revised versions, adaptations or derivative works of or from an article (such as a translation), to include in a collective work (such as an anthology), to text or data mine the article, even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit the author(s), do not represent the author as endorsing their adaptation of the article, and do not modify the article in such a way as to damage the author's honor or reputation.
Authors retain copyright in their work and license the publisher to publish the content. The publisher is the National Society for Cutaneous Medicine, with production and publishing support provided by OJS, Open Journal Systems,see https://pkp.sfu.
Prior to January 2022, authors transferred copyright to the National Society for Cutaneous Medicine. However, all articles are freely available to anyone in the world. There are no subscription fees, page charges, or article processing charges.