Successful Treatment of Cutaneous Collagenous Vasculopathy with Pulsed Dye Laser: A Case Report

Main Article Content

Emily Ahearn
Lihi Tzur
Meera Mahalingam
Nellie Konnikov

Keywords

pulsed dye laser, PDL, cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy

Abstract

Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy (CCV) is clinically characterized by symmetrical, progressive telangiectasias and an absence of systemic involvement. Histopathology is distinct and helps in differentiation from other vascular conditions that result in cutaneous telangiectasias. We present a case of biopsy-proven CCV that had localized clearance following biopsy and was successfully treated with pulsed dye laser. A healthy 36-year-old male presented with a 10-year history of progressive, blanching telangiectasias of the legs, thighs, and forearms. A punch biopsy of a representative patch on the patient’s right thigh demonstrated telangiectasias with thickened PAS-positive vessel walls and a sparse perivascular lymphoid infiltrate, features consistent with a diagnosis of CCV.  While there was localized clearance at the biopsy site and adjacent skin, the patient opted for treatment with PDL for his lesions elsewhere. After testing various PDL settings, greatest cosmetic improvement and minimal PIH was achieved with a spot size of 7 mm, pulse duration of 3 milliseconds (ms) and a fluence of 8 J/cm2. Continued resolution of CCV was noted at 24 months. We present this case to underscore the potential efficacy of PDL in the treatment of CCV.

References

1. Salama S, Rosenthal D. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy with generalized telangiectasia: An immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study. J Cutan Pathol. 2000;27(1):40-8. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0560.2000.027001040.x.

2. Knöpfel N, Martín-Santiago A, Saus C, Escudero-Góngora MM, Del Pozo LJ, Gómez C. Extensive acquired telangiectasias: comparison of generalized essential telangiectasia and cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2017;108(3):e21-e26. English, Spanish. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2016.02.020.

3. Stavrou C, Uthayakumar A, Calonje JE, Bunker CB. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy. BMJ Case Rep. 2021;14(3):e241434. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-241434

4. Salama S, Chorneyko K, Belovic B. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy associated with intravascular occlusive fibrin thrombi. J Cutan Pathol. 2014;41(4):386–93. doi: 10.1111/cup.12285.

5. Bondier L, Tardieu M, Leveque P, Challende I, Pinel N, Leccia MT. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy: Report of two cases presenting as disseminated telangiectasias and review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol. 2017;39(9):682-8. doi:10.1097/dad.0000000000000613.

6. Echeverría B, Sanmartín O, Botella-Estrada R, Vitiello M. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy successfully treated with pulsed dye laser. Int J Dermatol. 2012;51:1359-62. doi:10.1111/j.1365-4632.2011.05237.x.

7. Mitteldorf C, Joest B, Tronnier M. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy - remission of perivascular deposits after pulsed dye laser therapy. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2017;15(9):936-8. doi:10.1111/ddg.13311.

8. Grossman ME, Cohen M, Ravits M, Blume R, Magro CM. Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy: A report of three cases. J Cutan Pathol. 2022;49(5):491-495. doi: 10.1111/cup.14192.

9. Weisert E, Hoyer P, Arnold M, Goodwin B. Clinical improvement of cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy with intense pulsed light therapy. Dermatol Surg. 2021;47(10):1410-1. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003190.

10. Basso D, Ribero S, Blazek C, Dietrich N, Beltraminelli H, Ramelet AA, Borradori L, Adatto M. Cutaneous Collagenous Vasculopathy: A Rare Form of Microangiopathy Successfully Treated with a Combination of Multiplex Laser and Optimized Pulsed Light with a Review of the Literature. Dermatology. 2016;232(1):107-11. doi: 10.1159/000439126.

11. Camargo CM, Brotas AM, Ramos-e-Silva M, Carneiro S. Isomorphic phenomenon of Koebner: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol. 2013;31(6):741-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2013.05.012. PMID: 24160280.

12. Yadav S, De D, Kanwar AJ. Reverse koebner phenomenon in leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Indian J Dermatol. 2011;56(5):598-599. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.87169