Tele-dermatology Recruitment during COVID-19: An Application of Behavioral Economic Principles

Main Article Content

Morgan Chambers
Jeffrey Miller
Bruce Brod
Jordan Lim

Keywords

Teledermatology, Patient Recruitment, Behavioral Economics, COVID-19

Abstract

In the ever-changing state of healthcare during the recent COVID-19 pandemic, our system has innovated rapidly using tele-dermatology in acute and chronic patient management.  To combat barriers such as low patient enrollment, behavioral economics theories were implemented.  Underlying principles in choice architecture, include choice inertia, the way in which humans favor the status quo; and choice overload, where humans fail to make an optimal choice when presented with multiple options.  Using these theories, we modified support-staff scripts in our dermatology clinic used when rescheduling appointments.  Our baseline script group allowed for patients to choose from a list of options whereas our improvement script applied behavioral economic principles and used tele-dermatology as the default.  This quality improvement initiative was employed with the hypothesis that the “improvement” group would lead to an increase in tele-dermatology enrollment over an 8-week period.  Our results are clinically significant and demonstrate the effect behavioral economics has on patient enrollment in tele-dermatology, which will serve as an asset during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

References

1. Demiris G, Speedie SM, Hicks LL. Assessment of patients' acceptance of and satisfaction with teledermatology. Journal of medical systems. 2004 Dec 1;28(6):575-9.

2. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin; 2009.

3. Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R. Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of risk and uncertainty. 1988 Mar 1;1(1):7-59.

4. Emanuel EJ, Ubel PA, Kessler JB, Meyer G, Muller RW, Navathe AS, Patel P, Pearl R, Rosenthal MB, Sacks L, Sen AP. Using behavioral economics to design physician incentives that deliver high-value care. Annals of internal medicine. 2016 Jan 19;164(2):114-9.

5. Berry K, Butt M, Kirby JS. Influence of information framing on patient decisions to treat actinic keratosis. JAMA dermatology. 2017 May 1;153(5):421-6.

6. García-Romero MT, Geller AC, Kawachi I. Using behavioral economics to promote healthy behavior toward sun exposure in adolescents and young adults. Preventive medicine. 2015 Dec 1;81:184-8.

7. O’Keefe DJ, Wu D. Gain-framed messages do not motivate sun protection: A meta-analytic review of randomized trials comparing gain-framed and loss-framed appeals for promoting skin cancer prevention. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2012 Jun;9(6):2121-33.

8. Albertini JG, Wang P, Fahim C, Hutfless S, Stasko T, Vidimos AT, Leshin B, Billingsley EM, Coldiron BM, Bennett RG, Marks VJ. Evaluation of a peer-to-peer data transparency intervention for Mohs micrographic surgery overuse. JAMA dermatology. 2019 Aug 1;155(8):906-13.

9. Oussedik E, Cardwell LA, Patel NU, Onikoyi O, Feldman SR. An anchoring-based intervention to increase patient willingness to use injectable medication in psoriasis. JAMA dermatology. 2017 Sep 1;153(9):9