Main Article Content
inflammatory skin disease, chronic skin disease, handoffs
Importance: Managing chronic skin disease is often frustrating for both providers and patients, sometimes resulting in delayed diagnosis, inadequate therapy, and inconsistent care.
Objective: This study performs stakeholder analyses to identify unmet clinical needs in chronic skin disease management.
Methods: Survey of 33 providers and 25 patients at a Stanford Health Care Dermatology department.
Results: When evaluating a chronic skin condition such as psoriasis, 79% of dermatologists rely solely on subjective documentation (gestalt, body surface area, descriptive exam). Objective documentation (photographs or scoring assessment tools) is used by 21% of providers upon initial assessment and by 7% of providers to assess change in disease between office visits. While 83% of providers were comfortable assessing change in disease severity based on prior document by oneself, only 31% were comfortable assessing change based on prior documentation by another provider (p <0.001). Dermatologists expressed the need for better documentation modality in clinic (94%), and in between office visits by patients (91%). While 90% of patients reported it is moderately to extremely important to track their disease, only 16% of patients consistently do. Most patients preferred to monitor their disease at home (92%) using cameras (80%) or by smartphone (59%). Patients were willing to spend 5-30 minutes weekly to monthly to document their disease.
Conclusions and Relevance: This study identifies that dermatologists and patients need a solution that objectively and remotely monitors chronic skin diseases to optimize treatments, empower patients, and provide more cohesive care in a complex healthcare system.
1. Lim HW, Collins SAB, Resneck JS, et al. The burden of skin disease in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(5):958-972.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2016.12.043
2. Rappleye E. New-patient wait times for dermatologists in 15 major cities. https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/hospital-physician-relationships/new-patient-wait-times-for-dermatologists-in-15-major-cities.html. Accessed April 15, 2019.
3. Face S, Dalton S. Consistency of total body surface area assessment in severe burns: Implications for practice. Emerg Med Australas EMA. 2017;29(4):429-432. doi:10.1111/1742-6723.12806
4. Bożek A, Reich A. The reliability of three psoriasis assessment tools: Psoriasis area and severity index, body surface area and physician global assessment. Adv Clin Exp Med Off Organ Wroclaw Med Univ. 2017;26(5):851-856. doi:10.17219/acem/69804
5. Spuls PI, Lecluse LLA, Poulsen M-LNF, Bos JD, Stern RS, Nijsten T. How Good Are Clinical Severity and Outcome Measures for Psoriasis?: Quantitative Evaluation in a Systematic Review. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130(4):933-943. doi:10.1038/jid.2009.391
6. Gerbens L a. A, Prinsen C a. C, Chalmers JR, et al. Evaluation of the measurement properties of symptom measurement instruments for atopic eczema: a systematic review. Allergy. 2017;72(1):146-163. doi:10.1111/all.12959
7. Swerlick RA, Zhang C, Patel A, Chren MM, Chen S. The Skindex-mini: a streamlined QOL measurement tool suitable for routine use in clinic. J Am Acad Dermatol. December 2018. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2018.12.035
8. Armstrong A, Puig L, Langley R, et al. Validation of psychometric properties and development of response criteria for the psoriasis symptoms and signs diary (PSSD): results from a phase 3 clinical trial. J Dermatol Treat. 2019;30(1):27-34. doi:10.1080/09546634.2017.1364694
9. mHealth Economics Research Program. www.research2guidance.com. www.research2guidance.com. Published 2016. Accessed April 22, 2019.
10. Final Policy, Payment, and Quality Provisions Changes to the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule for Calendar Year 2019 | CMS. https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/final-policy-payment-and-quality-provisions-changes-medicare-physician-fee-schedule-calendar-year. Accessed April 16, 2019.