Main Article Content
teledermatology, quality improvement, photography
Background: Most teledermatology studies include reviews of programs on a limited scale, whereas there are fewer reports on how to expand a program to accommodate high patient volumes.
Objective: To share our insights into the growth and maintenance of a teledermatology program that sees over 100,000 cases a year.
Methods: Retrospective review of a teledermatology program between 2015 and 2022. Outcomes were compared between the initial phase from 2015-2017 and the maturation phase from 2018-2022.
Results: In 2015, the teledermatology program was piloted in 3 hospital centers and expanded to 10 more centers by 2017. There was a total of 12,385 cases in 2015, which increased to 139,110 cases in 2022. Despite the dramatic increase in number of cases, our program adapted well: the initial phase of program development resulted in 69.2% of concerns being treated remotely, compared to 70.9% of submissions in the later years, p <0.001.
Limitations: Overall generalizability as this study was performed in a large integrated health system.
Discussion: We maintain that the following can help scale a teledermatology program: 1. Communication with all interested parties; 2. Streamlined implementation of technological devices; 3. Training for dermatologists and primary providers; 4. Image guidelines to maintain photo quality.
2. Ranpariya V, Kats D, Lipoff JB. Direct-to-Consumer Teledermatology Growth: A Review and Outlook for the Future. Cutis. 2022;109(4):211-217. doi:10.12788/cutis.0503
3. Pathipati AS, Ko JM. Implementation and evaluation of Stanford Health Care direct-care teledermatology program. SAGE Open Med. 2016;4:2050312116659089. doi:10.1177/2050312116659089.
4. Hopkins ZH, Han G, Tejasvi T, et al. Teledermatology During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned and Future Directions. Cutis. 2022;109(1):12-13. doi:10.12788/cutis.0431
5. Maddukuri S, Patel J, Lipoff JB. Teledermatology Addressing Disparities in Health Care Access: a Review. Curr Dermatol Rep. 2021;10(2):40-47. doi:10.1007/s13671-021-00329-2
6. Marwaha SS, Fevrier H, Alexeeff S, et al. Comparative effectiveness study of face-to-face and teledermatology workflows for diagnosing skin cancer. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;81(5):1099-1106. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.01.067