Preference Signaling in the Dermatology Residency Match

Main Article Content

McKenzie Dirr
Nicholas Brownstone
Darrell Rigel

Keywords

residency, application, match

Abstract

Abstract not available. 

References

1. Mott NM, Carmody JB, Marzano DA, Hammoud MM. What’s in a Number? Breaking Down the Residency Match Rate. The New England journal of medicine. 2022;386(17):1583-1586. doi:10.1056/NEJMp2119716

2. Gangal A, Blalock TW. A perfect match: Pros and cons of preference signaling in dermatology. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2021;84(5):1504-1505. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.12.050

3. Chang CWD, Pletcher SD, Thorne MC, Malekzadeh S. Preference Signaling for the Otolaryngology Interview Market. The Laryngoscope. 2021;131(3):E744-E745. doi:10.1002/lary.29151

4. Association of American Medical Colleges. Supplemental ERAS Application Guide. https://students-residents.aamc.org/media/12326/download. Published August 2021. Accessed May 2022.

5. Association of Professors of Dermatology. Dermatology APD Statement on 2021-2022 Application Cycle. https://students-residents.aamc.org/media/12386/download. Published August 20, 2021. Accessed May 2022.

6. Association of American Medical Colleges. AAMC Supplemental ERAS® Application: Key Findings From the 2022 Application Cycle. https://www.aamc.org/media/58891/download. Published February 2022. Accessed May 2022.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>